Living History

Sorry I can't watch this shit in full. The guy being interviewed is claiming there's no fraud in the 2024 presidential election and not backing that up.

You cannot confidently assert that as something we are certain about based on nebulous bullshit like "we are still counting votes".

Your desire to assert that there absolutely is no fraud is suspicious. 

You can say "Well, it's complicated and the process of counting votes isn't over, so those numbers are bound to change which makes it a moving target and muddies the waters "

But things being unclear for valid reasons is absolutely not proof positive that there was NO fraud.

My belief is that Biden won and both Clinton and Harris lost because Trump did MORE election tampering when running against women than when running against a man because he was counting on "sexism" providing plausible deniability and making people disinclined to examine it too closely.

You have no actual proof that fraud did not occur.

Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The fact that it's not obvious and immediately apparent as to whether it's true or not absolutely does not mean you can confidently declare it to be false.


Popular posts from this blog

Never Again

Personal History